|
While it may seem strange to see the Charleston Trident Association of
Realtors and the Coastal Conservation League on the same side of an issue,
we're actually in agreement on as many issues as we are in opposition. A
recent issue we strongly agree on is the alternative "pitchfork" plan to
Maybank Highway to be presented to Charleston County Council tonight.
The alternative pitchfork and street grid for Johns Island will not have any
affect on plans for the Cross Island Expressway to Kiawah and Seabrook
islands or the extension of Interstate 526. Those two roads are separate
issues from the Maybank project and should be explored as parts of the
overall solution for gridlock in the Lowcountry.
The entire street plan for Johns Island will take two or three decades to
complete, but the pitchfork will provide immediate congestion relief and
would be built as soon as (or possibly sooner) than a widening of Maybank
Highway.
The critical challenge facing our elected leaders has been to address the
traffic issues and future growth of Johns Island while preserving its
character.
We support the pitchfork alternative because it meets three major
priorities: 1) linking with the land use the city of Charleston already has
planned for Johns Island, 2) remaining a financially viable alternative
using the funding available, 3) and having minimal infringement on the
rights of personal property owners.
The city of Charleston controls zoning for most of Maybank Highway and will
have a major say over how and in what fashion development occurs on the
island.
The city passed the Johns Island Plan last year, outlining its plans for
"gathering places" along Maybank Highway, using an adjacent street grid and
a traditional neighborhood design.
Since the land use has already been determined, it's time to link
transportation to the use on the ground. Sound planning principles are being
implemented to make sure Johns Island retains its rural character while
growing in a responsible fashion.
Linking transportation and land use is more than just a good plan on paper,
it's a way to implement the plan immediately to provide traffic relief.
Other jurisdictions in the state, such as Dorchester County and Beaufort,
are undertaking studies in an effort to link land use to transportation, so
this is not merely an "experiment" on Johns Island cooked up by planners and
conservation groups, rather it's a plan to allow Johns Island to get ahead
of the planning curve.
Nobody has more of a first-hand view of rising property taxes than Realtors.
We see the impact of property taxes on the Charleston market every day —
when a young couple looks to buy their first home or an industry scouts a
new location to bring jobs to the Lowcountry.
We would not support this project if the costs associated with it were not
achievable through money already set aside.
Cost estimates have shown the first and immediate relief — being the
pitchfork, a widening of Maybank from the pitchfork to the Stono River
bridge, and new intersections on River Road — would be comparable to that of
widening Maybank. Given our current economic situation and the
already-onerous tax burden homeowners face, the pitchfork is an ideal
solution as long as it can be implemented without an additional unbudgeted
expense.
The final and most critical advantage the pitchfork plan provides is
protection of private property rights.
This alternative pitchfork plan impacts only two property owners — both of
whom have already agreed to the project, instead of more than 100 who would
be impacted if Maybank Highway was widened. The right-of-way acquisition
process of two willing property owners will take far less time and be less
costly than a lengthy right-of-way acquisition process with more than 100
property owners.
We urge city and county leaders and community members to get behind this
plan. It's simply a matter of common sense and commitment to preserving our
quality of life that has led our organization to support a road that links
land use to transportation and infringes less on the rights of personal
property owners without placing a greater burden on taxpayers.
This plan shows there is hope for other municipalities and counties to
exercise prudent foresight in regional planning and promote the building of
better communities.
|